Film vs Digital Can You Tell the Difference

Morgan: Why in the world would a wedding photographer
which I consider combat photography shoot film? Kenneth: Let's find out. Morgan: Good? Kenneth: That was good. All right. Morgan: On February 13th, we're going to have
a free business coaching call.

You call into this free call, I'm going to
teach you my daily routine for success. It's a great principle, it's a way to change
your business life and change your perspective on how you work. So get over to theslantedlens.Com sign up
today, join us at 5 p.M., Learn that daily routine for success, it'll really help you
change your business. Morgan: Hi, this is Jay P.

Morgan. Kenneth: This is Kenneth Merrill. Morgan: And today on Slanted Lens we're going
to take a look at film versus digital. Why do people shoot film? Kenneth: A lot of people I know do, a lot
of wedding photographers.

My wife, she's a wedding photographer she
shoots digital and film at the same time. Morgan: So she's a hybrid shooter, she's shooting
both? Kenneth: Hybrid shooter, yeah. People love it. Morgan: That's a new term, hybrid shooting.

So, we're going to set up and we're going
to shoot on these three cameras. We've got an old Hasselblad which is a C/M
mechanical camera, nothing digital, nothing electrical about this thing. You can shoot black and white on that Tri-X. Kenneth: Yeah, Tri-X black and white, then
we have this Pentax 645 and Mac 2.

This camera came out in about 2003, it was
the last film body, medium format film body that Pentax made and it has all the bells
and whistles. Autofocus, it does two or three shots per
second with an autowinder so a far cry from the Hasselblad. And then we have the Nikon D850 which is probably
one of the best digital still cameras in the market today. Morgan: So can we get the same look by shooting
digital and going in on some of the presets and post processing, if we can give you the
same look in digital that you get shooting film? Kenneth: You will notice that there is a difference
obviously this is full frame and these are medium format and the reason we did that is
because of all the people I know who are shooting film professionally, none of them, not none
but most of them are not shooting full frame film.

And so we could have done that but I don't
feel like it would have been as useful compared to a lot of people who are shooting full frame
digital in a medium format film. A medium format film is going to give you
a much cleaner look than the full frame film will and honestly I think that's one of the
advantages that film still has is that you can shoot these really large formats. Even the medium format digital cameras are
not as large as these are so... Morgan: This is more the kind of what you're
going to get.

If somebody's out doing a wedding they're
more likely to have a 35 millimeter digital and a 2 1/4 for film. So we're going to look at dynamic range, and
then color Portra compared to digital and then Tri-X black and white compared to digital. Take a look at those three things so let's
get started see what we can do. Yeah, yeah, took a picture.

We got a frame, we got a frame, all right
here we go. Morgan: So we're back here at the extremely
scientific lab at The Slanted Lens where we'll analyze... Kenneth: The photo lab. Morgan: ...The photo lab, where we'll analyze
and evaluate and come up with conclusions with regards to what we just did out in the
field.

Kenneth: Strong, evidence-backed conclusions. Morgan: Absolutely. Kenneth: Completely objective. Morgan: CSI kinds of stuff.

Kenneth: There's nothing subjective about
this. Morgan: Nothing. Kenneth: All right, so let's get into this. So, what we did, we sent our film to Richard's
Photo Lab which is a really, really great developer and scanner in Santa Clarita.

Morgan: So all the color was scanned on a
Frontier scanner. Kenneth: And the black and white was on a
Noritsu. Morgan: Yeah. Kenneth: And then I took the digital images
from the Nikon and I ran them through what's called a VSCO film preset so there's a company
called VSCO Film and they do all these different presets that are basically stock emulations
and you can choose, you know? You have Kodak Tri-X, you have Portra...

Morgan: So a little choose your film stock. Kenneth: ...You have Fuji Velvia. Yeah. They have any film you can imagine you can
get from these guys, it's pretty awesome.

Morgan: Did you get up close when you did
them? Kenneth: I was actually surprised. I've been using VSCO film presets for years. My wife used them all the time for her photography,
but I was actually surprised at how close it got. I figured you know it'll be kind of close.

But it was like 80, 90% there most of the
time. But I did go in to each individual photo and
I did have to make extra adjustments to try and match it as close as possible and we'll
talk more about that later. Let's jump in. Morgan: So Kenneth asked me to, on my little
sheet here, to write down which I thought was which on each of these.

Some of these were hard, man. Kenneth: All right. So, for the first photo we have here, what
was your guess and why? Morgan: Film was on the right. The skin tone is a little bit red.

You see it especially in her arms and neck. Just this kind of blotchiness in her skin
and I think that feels more like film to me Kenneth: Okay. Which image do you like more? Which one would you pick if it was going to
go on your portfolio? Morgan: That's interesting. The one on the left feels so digitized to
me, just that perfect china doll face and all that kind of stuff.

Kenneth: In some ways, it feels like there's
more detail in the film image but pixel for pixel, I mean the film image had less resolution
you know because the scanner has less resolution than the 36 megapixel one on a Nikon so it's
funny because it's like there is more detail but in some ways there's less. It wasn't quite as sharp as the Nikon. Morgan: I don't think film renders skin as
pretty as digital does. I think the digital is a lot creamier looking
but that's also the preset you're putting on.

Kenneth: I will say just to keep this in mind
moving forward one of the biggest challenges I had with matching the digital was the skin
tone. So the Kodak has this really great way of
separating the skin from everything else in the image so the skin actually has a sort
of a magenta look to it but the greens in the background are still very green. But when I would try to adjust the Nikon if
I tried to pull more of the magenta out of the skin everything else in the image would
go magenta. I would have had to go in and like brush her
skin to kind of match the magenta so I had to make a choice between matching the overall
color or matching her skin.

Morgan: We also just look at the openness
of her eyes. There's definitely not near the dynamic range
in the film that you're getting in the digital. At least when you digitize the digital. Kenneth: This one is a great example of that.

I mean you get kind of locked in when you
scan the film in this way, straight out of the box the digital has less pull down on
the shadows. Morgan: The charm of the film, you would have
to say, is the fact that it isn't so perfect. Kenneth: I say that all the time. I love shooting film because I don't worry
about it, ironically.

I just say, "It's not going to be perfect." I think you can tell especially in this one
because the blown out highlights go a little magenta. Morgan: I said right on this one Kenneth: It's the left. Morgan: Is it? It doesn't seem consistent when I saw the
other ones. Yeah the film's more open and less contrasty Kenneth: I think again you can tell it's like,
it has more shadow on the legs on the digital.

You look at the highlights and there's way
more detail in her dress. This was the hardest one on the whole test. Morgan: I put right. Kenneth: You're right.

Morgan: It was a bit of a guess. It wasn't much a guess you think, if you look
at her forearm and her shoulder... Kenneth: It see more of the imperfection. Morgan: ...That just feels like film.

Kenneth: And also this is an instance where
you can tell that the Nikon has more pixels because you look at her eyelashes and there's
much more detail in her eyelashes. And also the lens just doesn't flare nearly
as well as the Nikon. Morgan: Now the black and white. I love the look of the black and white actually.

I feel like the film is just a little more
open on this one. I put the left, that's definitely wrong. Look at the depth, the feel. There's no way.

Kenneth: Yeah, that's wrong. Morgan: I can almost feel the grain, look
right there on those two. Look at the grain structure on the one on
the left that just feels like...Especially Tri-X Kenneth: Tri-X is kind of gritty. I'm the one that cut these and I can't even...

Morgan: You can just feel it. The grain pattern, look at the grain right
there. I've seen that so many times that is just
Tri-X, you know? Kenneth: I actually prefer because this one
turned out a little bit faded almost and I. Purposefully had to fade the digital so I
might have overdone it.

Morgan: There's kind of milky blacks. When you don't have much light her complexion
is much harsher in that image in the top. You see the imperfections much more there's
more detail in it. Kenneth: There's more detail in it.

Which is surprising, it's that weird thing
where the film has more sometimes it has less. You look at that and you're only wrong like
maybe two to three times out of what? 20 Images? 24 Images? Morgan: Twenty-four images, yeah. Kenneth: Something like that. That was the question it's like, does film
have a look worth you know, or I'm shooting film because it has that look I can't get
with digital.

It kind of does because you can tell which
one it is. Morgan: A guy who shot hundreds, hundreds
and hundreds of rolls of film can tell the difference. Kenneth: That's true. I think if you're going to shoot film professionally
it's more about your workflow and what you enjoy.

What makes you happy than it is about image
quality. Morgan: You're absolutely right. What makes you happy, what makes it interesting
and exciting to you and if it's a hook that gets your clientele to go, "Hey we love that
" you know? I mean if it's a hook that works, absolutely. Kenneth: I will say, if you're a beginning
photographer rather than going and spending $1000 on ADD or D5300 or something I actually
recommend going on eBay and buying some Canon AE-1 or something like that for 150 bucks
and buy 20 rolls of film.

And I think you'll learn the basics of photography
way faster than you will with your digital camera. Morgan: I think that's even cheating. Buy a Hasselblad that has no internal metering
in it so you have to learn to see exposure. You'd be surprised how much that'll teach
you actually.

Kenneth: All right so, dynamic range. I love doing dynamic range Morgan: This is a really interesting one to
me. Because I kind of know the outcome of this
one. Kenneth: All right, so I'm going to say first
of all I discovered that I did not take a properly exposed image on the Pentax.

Morgan: No? Kenneth: Somehow it just didn't happen. The digital is untouched. This is just straight raw, I didn't do any
[inaudible 00:11:02] just to see how it is. Morgan: We picked a nice setting for this,
I think.

It feels like... Kenneth: You have the white dress and the
[crosstalk]. Morgan: ...The dark black in the background
so for a dynamic range test it looks good. Kenneth: Plus one stops, they're all looking
pretty good.

Plus two stops, still don't see the difference. Nikon is holding up totally fine. At plus three stops, the Nikon just like,
abruptly falls apart. Morgan: It does.

Falls right off the cliff. Kenneth: It actually really surprised me because
I thought it would handle plus three. Plus four maybe not but I thought it'd be
okay with plus three. The film photos look normal they actually
look exactly the same as the other ones.

Morgan: They don't look different at all. Kenneth: Just crazy how much you can overexpose
it. Morgan: When we say film we're talking about
print film not transparency film. Kenneth: Right, not transparency.

Morgan: You cannot do this with transparency. Kenneth: Don't try this at home with transparency. Morgan: No, transparency film, you won't get
the same results. Kenneth: This is four stops over.

Morgan: Wow, look at the Nikon. Kenneth: The Nikon's gone. Morgan: That's a digital process, you know? Kenneth: Yeah, it's a different science. Morgan: But the color and the black and white,
it's starting to lose a little bit but it's not terrible.

Kenneth: So what I found is you look really
close at these...It's hard because I have them stacked next to each other...But you
look really close at these and the detail in the rock is the same across all the images,
details in the dress is the same across. What you do start to see though is the color
and the overall tonality start to wash out a tiny bit. Morgan: Which almost looks interesting. Kenneth: It opens up the shadows a little
bit.

Go to five stops, obviously Nikon's gone. The film I wish we'd gone to six stops because
I almost feel like maybe six stops would have been the limit. I don't know. Morgan: I wish we had gone to six.

Kenneth: I didn't expect film to make it to
five stops so we stopped there. Morgan: So five stops over, there are still
photos I would deliver to the client I would have no problem with it. It's just amazing. Morgan: Usually the problem though is that
with film, especially if you're doing anything inside, you don't have enough light.

You're not going to get a stopover. Kenneth: So let's go to underexposing. Now, minus one stop it seems fine. I mean they look great all across the board,
minus two stops I already see it with the film.

There isn't as much detail in the background. Morgan: No, you're starting to really block
up the blacks. Kenneth: The Nikon looks just the same. You got a nice three stops and now it's like,
a problem.

Morgan: Yeah. Kenneth: This is where I would say, " Okay,
shoot. What do I do now?" The Tri-X just gets like dark. It actually kind of looks like the portrait
has been sent through an airport X-ray and then minus four stops it's kind of gone.

Morgan: There's nothing there anymore. Kenneth: I wonder if they'd scan this to a
tiff. I wonder if I could massage it a little bit
but it's not really... Morgan: Look at the digital.

We're at minus four stops. As bad as a Nikon looked going in a plus it
holds up going under. Kenneth: It holds up. This would still work for you know like maybe
a six by eight photo print or something.

I wouldn't blow this image up but still, minus
four stops that's pretty incredible. Morgan: If you're shooting digital. If you're a hybrid shooter you should film
outside you shoot digital inside. Kenneth: That's a great way to look at it.

Because that film especially if you're shooting
like on a beach or something and I will say even on set I was shooting the film and I
wasn't worried about the exposure as much. I was like, "Oh yeah I think that's right. Got it." You know? With the Nikon I was freaking out because
I'd look at the screen on the back and it was too bright or whatever and I was really
worried about the tolerance with the highlights. So film can give you some peace of mind with
that but in terms of the shadows...

Morgan: When the dynamic range is on the bottom
like that it makes it so you shoot everywhere. With film it's on the top and you can't shoot
inside. Kenneth: It's true, it's true. Basically what you're saying is that signal
to noise ratio is lower with the digital.

So, what do you think? You're going to be shooting film from now
on? Morgan: You know, oddly enough I'm going to
start to shoot some film but here's my summation of it. I think that you can replicate the look enough
in digital that the bride's not going to be able to tell the difference. And the cost? We spent $150 on six rolls of film. That was just to process it.

We had to buy the six rolls of film too which
was another $30, $40 you know? So we're getting close to $200 to do six rolls
of film. If you're charging $2000 for a wedding, that's
a 10% investment. Kenneth: That's hard. Most hybrid shooters I know though are charging
4000 to 5000 for a wedding.

Morgan: Which makes sense. If you're in that category it's a cool thing
you've got this camera you pull out, do some shots. I mean, it becomes part of the show as much
as anything. So the cost is an issue I do think the film
has a really cool look and I didn't think I would say that but in looking at it I really
do and I love the look.

It just feels familiar, feels right to me
so I can see why people are doing it. I really can. Kenneth: I agree. I think in terms of flexibility obviously
digital has the advantage.

In terms of image, it depends on what you're
shooting. Honestly, I think film does have the advantage
in some ways but in most scenarios, digital probably still has the advantage so it really,
like we said before, comes down to workflow and what you like, what makes you happy. Morgan: So there you have it. We're going to upload all these images to
our website, theslantedlens.Com/filmcomparison.

Go there, download them, we're going to have
the raw Nikon images, we're going to have the ones that Kenneth corrected and then the
film images. Take that raw image go into other softwares,
correct them, try to get it as close to film as possible in other softwares and post those
to our Facebook group. We want to see what other softwares are doing,
how they compare, let our community kind of look and see if there's other software out
there that's even better. We'll give $50 worth of film to the one that
we think comes up with the best conversion.

So get over to theslantedfilms.Com/filmcomparison
and download those images and see what you can do so keep those cameras rolling. Kenneth: Keep on clicking. Morgan: It's February, we're giving away four
of these Platypod maxes. This is a plate that allows you to put your
camera in very difficult places.

It's a small simple plate but it gives you
hundreds of opportunities to put your camera in places that normally you can't get it into
so get over to theslantedlens.Com where you can possibly win one. Sign up, you might win one. All right. So it's probably been 11 years since I've
loaded one of these, but I used to load these things...You get so you're so fast at it,
you know, you just load 'em like crazy, but it's been a long time.

Kenneth: It's been about 24 hours. No, just kidding. I don't shoot film that often. Morgan: So here we go..